There's absolutely no controversy about whether or not planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11. There were several thousand (if not more) people who saw the whole thing in person. The idea that CNN (or anyone else) faked video to make appear that a plane hit that building only falls short of being laughable because there's nothing funny about using a national trauma to serve an anarchist/anti-federalist agenda.
"It's been a long December, and there's reason to believe maybe this year will be better than the last."
There's absolutely no controversy about whether or not planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11. There were several thousand (if not more) people who saw the whole thing in person. The idea that CNN (or anyone else) faked video to make appear that a plane hit that building only falls short of being laughable because there's nothing funny about using a national trauma to serve an anarchist/anti-federalist agenda.
You missed the point. The subject matter wasn't planes.
The author wants to know when, where and how CNN filmed that particular footage.
I don't see anything unreasonable about wanting some answers from CNN and the "amateur" videographer.
There's absolutely no controversy about whether or not planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11. There were several thousand (if not more) people who saw the whole thing in person. The idea that CNN (or anyone else) faked video to make appear that a plane hit that building only falls short of being laughable because there's nothing funny about using a national trauma to serve an anarchist/anti-federalist agenda.
You missed the point. The subject matter wasn't planes.
The author wants to know when, where and how CNN filmed that particular footage.
I don't see anything unreasonable about wanting some answers from CNN and the "amateur" videographer.
I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end? The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it? Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?
If you look at the comments of the video, and his responses, it's pretty clear that he thinks 9/11 never happened. Take this comment:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
He doesn't think planes hit the buildings. He doesn't even think people really died!
"It's been a long December, and there's reason to believe maybe this year will be better than the last."
There's absolutely no controversy about whether or not planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11. There were several thousand (if not more) people who saw the whole thing in person. The idea that CNN (or anyone else) faked video to make appear that a plane hit that building only falls short of being laughable because there's nothing funny about using a national trauma to serve an anarchist/anti-federalist agenda.
You missed the point. The subject matter wasn't planes.
The author wants to know when, where and how CNN filmed that particular footage.
I don't see anything unreasonable about wanting some answers from CNN and the "amateur" videographer.
I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end? The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it? Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?
If you look at the comments of the video, and his responses, it's pretty clear that he thinks 9/11 never happened. Take this comment:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
He doesn't think planes hit the buildings. He doesn't even think people really died!
I don't think that you and I are talking about the same video.
There's absolutely no controversy about whether or not planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11. There were several thousand (if not more) people who saw the whole thing in person. The idea that CNN (or anyone else) faked video to make appear that a plane hit that building only falls short of being laughable because there's nothing funny about using a national trauma to serve an anarchist/anti-federalist agenda.
You missed the point. The subject matter wasn't planes.
The author wants to know when, where and how CNN filmed that particular footage.
I don't see anything unreasonable about wanting some answers from CNN and the "amateur" videographer.
I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end? The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it? Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?
If you look at the comments of the video, and his responses, it's pretty clear that he thinks 9/11 never happened. Take this comment:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
He doesn't think planes hit the buildings. He doesn't even think people really died!
I don't think that you and I are talking about the same video.
I am referring to the video titled:
When Where and How did they film this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmCHVDcKH20&feature=related
I'm referring to the same video. I read through all the comments to find out what this guy's deal was, and what he thought about 9/11. The comments I'm talking about are on page 10 of the comments on the video.
This comment, by a user:
"I suppose the obituaries were fake too huh ? I suppose the Airline's jets that were vaporized were also the victims of some BS government conspiracy? It is easier to prove that it DID happen. Just open your eyes."
is followed by this comment, by the poster of the video:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
"It's been a long December, and there's reason to believe maybe this year will be better than the last."
There's absolutely no controversy about whether or not planes hit the Twin Towers on 9/11. There were several thousand (if not more) people who saw the whole thing in person. The idea that CNN (or anyone else) faked video to make appear that a plane hit that building only falls short of being laughable because there's nothing funny about using a national trauma to serve an anarchist/anti-federalist agenda.
You missed the point. The subject matter wasn't planes.
The author wants to know when, where and how CNN filmed that particular footage.
I don't see anything unreasonable about wanting some answers from CNN and the "amateur" videographer.
I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end? The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it? Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?
If you look at the comments of the video, and his responses, it's pretty clear that he thinks 9/11 never happened. Take this comment:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
He doesn't think planes hit the buildings. He doesn't even think people really died!
She has a point, but more to the point, those claimed planes, with said cargo (fuel) could never demo those buildings.
And when have 2 planes even taken down 3 buildings?
And when have buildings like these even been taken down with fire...never.
And one building didn't even get hit with anything. Funny it was a disaster command center, one of the heaviest build buildings built on the planed, but it fell like demolition...because it was demo'ed...and that takes time to set up...thats not done in an afternoon. Oh and lets not forget, news agencies reported the fall 20 to 25 min's before they fell. How did that happen Brian? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
etc etc.
Something else physics aren't being applied to what we are being told. Physical matter doesn't respond to what we are being sold. It just doesn't work that way.
But you trust the government line, above your mind and your eyes.
Answer: what we have been told is a lie....and their are many many things that need to be question about what we were sold.
"...we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the US, ...conspiring with others around the world to build ...-- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefeller
"I'm referring to the same video. I read through all the comments to find out what this guy's deal was, and what he thought about 9/11. The comments I'm talking about are on page 10 of the comments on the video."
crhamlett comment:
The video I am referring to has no comments other than the ones that I have posted. I went through the video myself and have posted everything that was a caption. Like I said there was no audio narration. I never saw any pages of comments, so I don't know anything about a page 10 that you are referring to.
Brian wrote:
"This comment, by a user:
"I suppose the obituaries were fake too huh ? I suppose the Airline's jets that were vaporized were also the victims of some BS government conspiracy? It is easier to prove that it DID happen. Just open your eyes."
is followed by this comment, by the poster of the video:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
crhamlett comment:
You are still referring to a totally different video than the the one this thread is about. Like I said:
"The subject matter wasn't planes.
The author wants to know when, where and how CNN filmed that particular footage.
I don't see anything unreasonable about wanting some answers from CNN and the "amateur" videographer."
Brian wrote:
"I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end?"
crhamlett comment:
"To what end?" What are you referring to?
Brian wrote:
"The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it?"
crhamlett comment:
I have seen other footage of the jets hitting the towers, yet I doubt the footage that is in question here. I would like to know what CNN has to say about this footage and answer all the questions asked by the author of the You Tube presentation.
When has it ever been unreasonable to question a news network about their coverage of news story?
When has it ever been unreasonable to compare one network news coverage with another one?...and then ask questions about the differences in coverage?
The media is not God. If there is the possibility that we have been lied to, shouldn't we want know?
It is NOT unreasonable to ask questions and expect answers.
Brian wrote:
"Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?"
crhamlett comment:
In this case it does matter because the height at which the video was shot from is in question. Also there are questions as to how amateur the photographer was.
The author of this You Tube is wanting to have an explanation. There's nothing wrong with that. Maybe there are reasonable answers to his questions. Having CNN and the photographer answer all questions is the only way I see to put this to rest.
Robodoon wrote: Brian wrote: I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end? The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it? Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?
If you look at the comments of the video, and his responses, it's pretty clear that he thinks 9/11 never happened. Take this comment:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
He doesn't think planes hit the buildings. He doesn't even think people really died!
She has a point, but more to the point, those claimed planes, with said cargo (fuel) could never demo those buildings.
And when have 2 planes even taken down 3 buildings?
And when have buildings like these even been taken down with fire...never.
And one building didn't even get hit with anything. Funny it was a disaster command center, one of the heaviest build buildings built on the planed, but it fell like demolition...because it was demo'ed...and that takes time to set up...thats not done in an afternoon. Oh and lets not forget, news agencies reported the fall 20 to 25 min's before they fell. How did that happen Brian? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
etc etc.
Something else physics aren't being applied to what we are being told. Physical matter doesn't respond to what we are being sold. It just doesn't work that way.
But you trust the government line, above your mind and your eyes.
Answer: what we have been told is a lie....and their are many many things that need to be question about what we were sold.
Here's the thing, Rob: I don't have to trust the government, or my eyes, or my mind. The destruction of the Twin Towers happened in plain sight of hundreds of thousands of witnesses. It all happened in the middle of Manhattan as people were starting their workday. Anyone trying to claim that planes never hit the buildings (as this person clearly believes) is either lying for their own purposes or needs to be hospitalized and on some serious psychiatric medications.
You expose your conditioning in your answer. What we are told happened doesn't work with physics. Its impossible....but you believe TV. Something did hit the towers....but what...it wasn't what we were told. Nor could what we are told hit them do what happened....and nothing hit building 7.
Second, the Twin Towers weren't taken down by fire alone. You're forgetting the impact of the planes and the damage they did to the structure. It's that, plus the fire, that took the structure of the Twin Towers down. As for Building 7, it went down after being weakened for hours by burning debris. As for the way the buildings collapsed, that's been explained over and over: That's the way such buildings collapse. Buildings like that don't just fall over on their sides.
"It's been a long December, and there's reason to believe maybe this year will be better than the last."
"Anyone trying to claim that planes never hit the buildings" I never saw planes hit building 7, did you? Remember building 7 came down in free fall speed.
crhamlet: The video and comments I'm talking about are associated with the seekeroftruth wrote: "Anyone trying to claim that planes never hit the buildings" I never saw planes hit building 7, did you? Remember building 7 came down in free fall speed.
When I said, "the buildings", I wasn't being precise enough, obviously. I was referring to the Twin Towers. Clearly, anyone who did see planes hit Building 7 is delusional and needs the same kind of meds.
Building 7 burned for hours and was hit by all kinds of debris from the collapse of the Twin Towers. That's why it fell.
And it didn't fall at free-fall speed:
"It's been a long December, and there's reason to believe maybe this year will be better than the last."
Brian wrote: Robodoon wrote: Brian wrote: I do realize that the author wants to know when/how the footage was taken, but to what end? The only reason I can think of for doubting the footage is that you don't think the plane attack happened that way. Otherwise, why question it? Does it matter where the shot was taken from, if it's an accurate picture of the event?
If you look at the comments of the video, and his responses, it's pretty clear that he thinks 9/11 never happened. Take this comment:
"yes. the obituaries were fake. According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics the planes never took off. They depend on gullible and lazy people like you to be easily deceived. A nation of passive viewers, gullible like dull children sitting in front of a flickering screen. Mindless propaganda receivers JUST LIKE YOU, mr907. Go watch the videos on SimonShack's channel and come back when you're no longer clueless."
He doesn't think planes hit the buildings. He doesn't even think people really died!
She has a point, but more to the point, those claimed planes, with said cargo (fuel) could never demo those buildings.
And when have 2 planes even taken down 3 buildings?
And when have buildings like these even been taken down with fire...never.
And one building didn't even get hit with anything. Funny it was a disaster command center, one of the heaviest build buildings built on the planed, but it fell like demolition...because it was demo'ed...and that takes time to set up...thats not done in an afternoon. Oh and lets not forget, news agencies reported the fall 20 to 25 min's before they fell. How did that happen Brian? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc
etc etc.
Something else physics aren't being applied to what we are being told. Physical matter doesn't respond to what we are being sold. It just doesn't work that way.
But you trust the government line, above your mind and your eyes.
Answer: what we have been told is a lie....and their are many many things that need to be question about what we were sold.
Here's the thing, Rob: I don't have to trust the government, or my eyes, or my mind. The destruction of the Twin Towers happened in plain sight of hundreds of thousands of witnesses. It all happened in the middle of Manhattan as people were starting their workday. Anyone trying to claim that planes never hit the buildings (as this person clearly believes) is either lying for their own purposes or needs to be hospitalized and on some serious psychiatric medications.
You expose your conditioning in your answer. What we are told happened doesn't work with physics. Its impossible....but you believe TV. Something did hit the towers....but what...it wasn't what we were told. Nor could what we are told hit them do what happened....and nothing hit building 7.
Second, the Twin Towers weren't taken down by fire alone. You're forgetting the impact of the planes and the damage they did to the structure. It's that, plus the fire, that took the structure of the Twin Towers down. As for Building 7, it went down after being weakened for hours by burning debris. As for the way the buildings collap
