|
||||||
![]() |
Recent Posts | Search by username | ![]() |
Contact Us | ![]() |
Login | ![]() |
Register |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
24HourForums.com > Supported Forums > Robodoon's New World Order Zone > Presidential Frontrunners would surrender Americas borders |
| Moderated by: SchooBaka, Robodoon, crhamlett, bg |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Author | Post | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Robodoon Original500© Member God Fearing Patriot
|
Posted: 03:51 pm |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PRESIDENTIAL FRONTRUNNERS WOULD SURRENDER AMERICA'S BORDERS By Pastor Chuck Baldwin February 6, 2007 NewsWithViews.com Looking at the potential presidential frontrunners for both the Democrat and Republican parties reveals that virtually everyone of them would surrender America's borders. Not one of the presidential frontrunners from either party would protect our borders against illegal immigration. Just the opposite. They would continue George Bush's policy of wide open borders, including his determination to grant amnesty to illegals. In other words, when it comes to protecting our borders, there is not a nickel's worth of difference between the two major parties' leading presidential contenders. Democratic presidential frontrunners include John Edwards, Barak Obama, and Hillary Clinton. Republican frontrunners include John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Rudy Giuliani. In fact, virtually every Democratic candidate, and even the vast majority of Republican candidates, would provide no relief to America's border problems. And, yes, that includes Sam Brownback and Newt Gingrich. Notable exceptions include Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul, and Tom Tancredo, with Tancredo at the head of the class. Obviously, should Hunter, Paul, or Tancredo miraculously win the White House, the push for a North American Union (NAU) complete with a NAFTA superhighway and a trilateral, hemispheric government, would be stopped dead in its tracks. For this reason, the GOP machine (and the insiders who control it) will never allow someone such as Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul, or Tom Tancredo to obtain the nomination. It's time the American people faced a hard, cold reality: no matter who the two major parties nominate in November 2008, the push for open borders, amnesty for illegal aliens, and the NAU will continue unabated. In other words, anyone who believes that unimpeded illegal immigration (and related issues) just might be the biggest threat to our national sovereignty and security (and count me as one who does) will not be able to vote for either the Republican or Democratic nominee in 2008. It's time to start preparing for that reality now. Does that mean that Republicans should not do everything they can to help Tancredo, Paul, or Hunter gain the nomination? Of course not. If the vast majority of the GOP rank and file would get solidly behind these three men, one of them might have a chance of succeeding. However, the track record of the GOP faithful is not very reassuring. Instead of supporting principled, uncompromising men of integrity, such as the three men named above, Republican voters will doubtless buy into the party mantra of pragmatism and help nominate another spineless globalist such as currently occupies the White House, which will leave us exactly where we are now. So, here is the sixty-four million dollar question: What will principled conservative voters do in 2008? My hope and prayer is that after failing to receive their party's nomination, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, and Duncan Hunter (or at least one of them) will leave the party and bring their (his) followers to the Constitution Party (CP). In all likelihood, the CP will have ballot access in over 45 states. It is already the third largest political party in the country and is currently the fastest growing political party in the nation. A national leader such as Paul, Tancredo, or Hunter would provide the CP with a very attractive alternative to the globalist candidates being offered by the two major parties.
By nature, I am not a single issue voter. However, I am sensible enough to realize that there are currently a handful of issues that will literally make or break America's future. And right now, the illegal immigration and emerging North American Union issues are at the very top of the list. Further failure on these issues will mean the end of America as we know it. And I mean very soon.
Regardless of what Hunter, Paul, and Tancredo ultimately do, Republicans, Democrats, and Independents who believe we must protect America's borders, stop the burgeoning North American Union, and secure our national sovereignty must be prepared to abandon the two major parties' presidential nominees in 2008 and support an "America First" third party candidate. Even a virtually unknown candidate with limited experience, but someone who understands the issues and has the backbone to do what is right, would be head and shoulders above what the two major parties are currently shoving down our throats. Better start preparing yourselves for it now, folks. © 2007 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin345.htm
![]() "...we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the US, ...conspiring with others around the world to build ...-- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefeller |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
moguitar Guest
|
Posted: 06:22 pm |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My vote is for those three patriots no matter which party they are in. With 70% of Americans wanting the illegals out and employers fined, amnesty or continued open borders will find the US in a civil/race war/revolution. Those who side against the vast majority would have to be considered enemies of the USA. So far, many our own elected officials have reneged on their Oaths and word, and are on the side of enemies treasonously. They attempt to get military and various LEO orgs leaders on their felonious side. It would be unbelievable if I haven't seen it happen over the years. The country I fought for, led by traitors to that very country, Vietnam and Korea Combat Veterans, and the Marines at Iwo Jima, and so many others fought to preserve. Those of us left will fight to the death for the USA.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Robodoon Original500© Member God Fearing Patriot
|
Posted: 10:13 pm |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
moguitar wrote: My vote is for those three patriots no matter which party they are in. With 70% of Americans wanting the illegals out and employers fined, amnesty or continued open borders will find the US in a civil/race war/revolution. Those who side against the vast majority would have to be considered enemies of the USA. Well they certainly have my support as well. Yes its pretty bad out there, and don't get me wrong I would like america back too, thats part of the reason I'm such a zeolous poster. There has been so much evil done against we the people, but sadly people don't know about it, to much TV you know...like all the POW's we left to rot in jail. They tell us they don't leave our soldiers behind, but yes they do...and thats just wrong.
![]() "...we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the US, ...conspiring with others around the world to build ...-- one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefeller |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
24HourForums.com > Supported Forums > Robodoon's New World Order Zone > Presidential Frontrunners would surrender Americas borders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Site Supporters | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Posts Of The Day | Mock Forums | WowClassic | |