Enjoy the free Classified Ads! 24HourForums.com Home Thank you for supporting us. Click to enter Posts Of The Day.
Recent Posts Search by username
Search Contact Us Login Register
When logged in, click this to open up the Jumper for easier navigation. Click for details on our forum system in the Forum Center.
Click to be shown the (Top 10 and Management) forums listed in the top section of the site. Click to be shown the (Supported) forums listed in the middle section of the site. Click to be shown the (UnSupported) forums listed in the bottom section of the site. Click to learn about, or pay for, forum Sponsorships. Click for the Official Forum Voting Poll.  VOTE! Click for info on owning a forum here at 24.


Share this topic...
Digg!  - Digg   Slashdot  - SlashDot    - del.icio.us    - Reddit    - StumbleUpon   - Facebook

 Moderated by: AussiePam

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
cynicalninja
Forum-Blogger©
Original500© Member

Smiling Shinobi
Joined: 
Location: In The Not So Grim North., United Kingdom
Posts: 4842
MyResume: 
MyJob: Resident Ninja
MyForum: cynicalninjas media molehill
MyLove: Sevenna
MyWish: To live forever - so far so good.
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: My business
Status:  Online
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 01:53 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Rape case ruling shocks Australia

Sexual abuse has been a noted problem in indigenous communities
A judge's decision not to jail nine men guilty of raping a 10-year-old girl in an Aboriginal community has triggered outrage in Australia.

The offenders were either placed on probation or given suspended sentences for the 2005 rape in the Aurukun settlement, in northern Queensland.

In her ruling, Judge Sarah Bradley told them that the victim "probably agreed to have sex with all of you".

A review of sexual abuse sentences in Aboriginal Queensland has been ordered.

Sentencing seven of the accused in Cairns in October, Judge Bradley told them that the girl involved was not forced into sex, according to a report in The Australian newspaper.

She placed six of the offenders, who were minors at the time of the rape, on probation for 12 months, local media said.

The three other defendants were handed suspended six-month prison sentences.

Judge Bradley later defended her sentencing, telling The Australian that the sentences were "appropriate" because they were the penalties sought by the prosecution.

'No excuse'

But Australia's newly-elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has now spoken out against the ruling, saying he was "appalled" by the verdict.

"I am horrified by cases like this, involving sexual violence against women and children. My attitude is one of zero tolerance," he told reporters in Queensland, his home state.


Boni Robertson, an Aboriginal activist in Queensland, said there could be no excuse for the judge's decision.

"There is nothing culturally, there is nothing morally, there is nothing socially and there is definitely nothing legally that would ever allow this sort of decision to be made," she said.

Queensland Premier Anna Bligh has now announced a review of all sentences given over the last two years in the communities in the Cape York region where the case occurred.

"I am not prepared to just write this off as an unusual one-off case," she said.

"I want to satisfy myself that the people of Cape York, and the people who live in remote indigenous communities, are receiving the same level of justice as we can expect in any other community in Queensland."

The offenders came from some of the most powerful and prominent Aboriginal families in Cape York, while the victim's family had a lower status, the Australian reported.

The case comes six months after a high-profile inquiry into child sex abuse in remote northern Australia said it found problems in every Aborigine community visited by researchers.

That inquiry led to an intervention programme in the Northern Territory.



Ads appear if not logged in.

AussiePam
Original500© Member

Wild Child
Joined: 
Location: Australia
Posts: 920
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:50 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Indeed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I personally am totally sick of excuses being made because the people involved happen to be Aboriginal or of ethnic descent and therefore some limpwristed folk feel it's culturally sensitive not to apply the normal laws of Australia to them. Bugger that.   And bugger political correctness anyway.

This is not a fifteen year old girl who had consensual sex with a seventeen year old boy  - where in my opinion the legal situation (it's still statutory rape)  doesn't quite fit the reality.

The little girl in this case  is ten years old.

A similar age to that of the little girls whose genitals are mutilated in line with certain ethnic traditions.

It's good  the case has hit the media. The previous federal government got into a lot of trouble  for trying to intervene in what is usually considered a State matter, to improve the chances of children of both sexes in some Aboriginal settlements of not being routinely sexually abused. 

I don't give a damn if Aboriginals were here first. We were all somewhere first, and got conquered and moved on etc etc. The laws of the land apply to all Australians, old and new,  including the middle eastern young men in Sydney who recently indulged in some packraping of pale skinned girls out of racial contempt and were appropriately dealt with.  

We need to protect children from all kinds of predation.

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4949
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:55 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
cynicalninja wrote: In her ruling, Judge Sarah Bradley told them that the victim "probably agreed to have sex with all of you". 

Judge Bradley told them that the girl involved was not forced into sex, according to a report in The Australian newspaper.

Unless the laws are so very different than here in America, I would have thought that 10 year old kids there can't give legal consent for something like having sex with adults.  Similar to how they can't have binding contracts because they signed it.




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.
AussiePam
Original500© Member

Wild Child
Joined: 
Location: Australia
Posts: 920
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:19 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Sixteen is the age of consent in Australia.

That any judge even considered the possibility of consent in this case is ludicrous.


Ads appear if not logged in.

AussiePam
Original500© Member

Wild Child
Joined: 
Location: Australia
Posts: 920
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 08:20 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
The plot thickens. The latest reports say this little girl was pack raped first at the age of 7, taken into a non-indigenous (oh horror!) foster home, then foreceably returned to her 'reservation' by welfare people, where this second pack rape took place. It added that she has contracted venereal disease. She is now 11.


 Current time is 05:29 pm


Site Supporters
Posts Of The Day Mock Forums WowClassic



Themes and most mods done in collaboration with: WowClassic - powerful forum software with the best support service.
We are partners with Forum Owner Services
Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez