Enjoy the free Classified Ads! 24HourForums.com Home Thank you for supporting us. Click to enter Posts Of The Day.
Recent Posts Search by username
Search Contact Us Login Register
When logged in, click this to open up the Jumper for easier navigation. Click for details on our forum system in the Forum Center.
Click to be shown the (Top 10 and Management) forums listed in the top section of the site. Click to be shown the (Supported) forums listed in the middle section of the site. Click to be shown the (UnSupported) forums listed in the bottom section of the site. Click to learn about, or pay for, forum Sponsorships. Click for the Official Forum Voting Poll.  VOTE! Click for info on owning a forum here at 24.


Share this topic...
Digg!  - Digg   Slashdot  - SlashDot    - del.icio.us    - Reddit    - StumbleUpon   - Facebook

 Moderated by: Aethelred

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
HARGIS
Original500© Member


Joined: 
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 35
MyResume: 
MyJob: student
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 01:26 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
I posted a topic about Freemasons a while back because I was going to be doing my Senior Thesis on it.  Well, due to the lack of solid evidence and the overwhelming amount of conspiracy theories I have changed my topic.

Anyway, I am doing it on John Brown and the Pottawatomie Massacre.  I am looking to say that John Brown was not a crazed terrorist, but more of a monomaniac raised in an atmosphere that hated slaveholders and he just got a little carried away before everyone else did. 

What say you?

 

*This isn't me trying to get people to do my work for me, I am just interested to hear other points of view about it.


Ads appear if not logged in.

HARGIS
Original500© Member


Joined: 
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 35
MyResume: 
MyJob: student
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 05:33 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
I finished my first semester of this paper and I have found that neither of my first two options were really true.

He was not liked by the Southerners (obviously), but he was also not liked by the Free Soil Party. He was isolated as one of the few people that believed that African-Americans were equals.

Also, I have concluded that John Brown did not commit the acts of violence for the cause of slavery, but rather the cause of his own survival.

shirohniichan
Original500© Member

Obscurius per obscurum
Joined: 
Location: South Central Orange County, California USA
Posts: 1778
MyResume: 
MyJob: Car salesman
MyForum: 
MyLove: Russian nationalist music (no, I'm serious)
MyWish: Whirled peas
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: About as male as can be
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 08:17 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
HARGIS wrote: Also, I have concluded that John Brown did not commit the acts of violence for the cause of slavery, but rather the cause of his own survival.

I haven't read much about John Brown, so could you tell me what led you to your conclusion that he didn't commit acts of violence for the cause of slavery? I'd be interested to know.

I can't hear the Battlehymn of the Republic without thinking of:


John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave;
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave;
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave;
His soul's marching on!

shirohniichan
Original500© Member

Obscurius per obscurum
Joined: 
Location: South Central Orange County, California USA
Posts: 1778
MyResume: 
MyJob: Car salesman
MyForum: 
MyLove: Russian nationalist music (no, I'm serious)
MyWish: Whirled peas
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: About as male as can be
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 11:06 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
It stated in chapter 151, section12 of the ruffian code that, “Any free person, by speaking or by writing, assert or maintain that persons have not the right to hold slaves in this Territory…shall be guilty of felony, and punished by imprisonment at hard labor for a term of not less than two years.”
Gee, they didn't think much of free speech, did they?

I don't sympathize with violent abolitionists, but I certainly don't sympathize with slave owners or those who committed violence to silence those who spoke out against it. I have to tip my hat to the Quakers for their part in running the Underground Railroad, even if I don't like their theology.

foxglovepress
Forum-Blogger©
Original500© Member

NON-PC!!
Joined: 
Location: USA
Posts: 7862
MyResume: 
MyJob: Love my FAMILY, COUNTRY and Dogs!!
MyForum: Politics- Religion- Open Tal
MyLove: Family and ?
MyWish: A government for WE THE PEOPLE!
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: On Hold for now.....
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 12:12 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
HARGIS wrote: I posted a topic about Freemasons a while back because I was going to be doing my Senior Thesis on it.  Well, due to the lack of solid evidence and the overwhelming amount of conspiracy theories I have changed my topic.

Anyway, I am doing it on John Brown and the Pottawatomie Massacre.  I am looking to say that John Brown was not a crazed terrorist, but more of a monomaniac raised in an atmosphere that hated slaveholders and he just got a little carried away before everyone else did. 

What say you?

 

*This isn't me trying to get people to do my work for me, I am just interested to hear other points of view about it.

I go with a Patriot who was out of touch with reality.  I think he may have been one of a few who really knew what was right, and also knew trying to work with his government, was a waste of time and energy!  Kind of like todays patriots who are against the illegal invasion.  I haven't read anything as of yet that tells me he was just a terrorist.  Is that word used to describe him TODAY?  Or did they call him a Terrorist back then?  Interesting word, it kind of depends on who's using it.  Are they meaning "someone against his country....or someone against  his government?" 




Justice for Mark.....Imprison Employers Who Hire ILLEGALS!
HARGIS
Original500© Member


Joined: 
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 35
MyResume: 
MyJob: student
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 05:51 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
shirohniichan wrote: It stated in chapter 151, section12 of the ruffian code that, “Any free person, by speaking or by writing, assert or maintain that persons have not the right to hold slaves in this Territory…shall be guilty of felony, and punished by imprisonment at hard labor for a term of not less than two years.”
Gee, they didn't think much of free speech, did they?

I don't sympathize with violent abolitionists, but I certainly don't sympathize with slave owners or those who committed violence to silence those who spoke out against it. I have to tip my hat to the Quakers for their part in running the Underground Railroad, even if I don't like their theology.


That is another interesting point.  There were less than 200 slaves in the territory during this time.  Very few, if any, of the men around Osawatomie were slave owners. 

Not only did John Brown disagree with the pro-slavery men, he also disagreed with many of the abolitionists.  The Free Soil Party members only wanted abolition for the good of the white laborer (wages would increase w/out slavery).  John Brown was for 100% equal rights for African-Americans (which was not really popular in 1856).

The man that kicked Brown out of Kansas was a Free Soil leader.

Last edited on 05:52 am by HARGIS


Ads appear if not logged in.

jpd1975
Guardian1000© Member
 
jpd1975
Joined: 
Location: Not Applicable, New Jersey USA
Posts: 27
MyResume: 
MyJob: working
MyForum: 
MyLove: my wife, my son and my dogs
MyWish: money
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 08:04 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
The term terrorist is oft applied to someone by an establishment or government that has a vested interest in the "status quo." IF you asked King

George III, George Washington and the rest of the fonding fathers were terrorists.

The Jews that fought the British Imperial presence in Palestine (Present day Israel) were labeled terrorists.

Our current administration here applies the label not only to Muslims that intend to commit violent acts but also to citizens that believe that there may be US government complicity in 9/11.

I guess the point of my post is, that the term "Terrorist" is subjective. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.


 Current time is 05:08 am


Site Supporters
Posts Of The Day Mock Forums WowClassic



Themes and most mods done in collaboration with: WowClassic - powerful forum software with the best support service.
We are partners with Forum Owner Services
Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez