Enjoy the free Classified Ads! 24HourForums.com Home Thank you for supporting us. Click to enter Posts Of The Day.
Recent Posts Search by username
Search Contact Us Login Register
When logged in, click this to open up the Jumper for easier navigation. Click for details on our forum system in the Forum Center.
Click to be shown the (Top 10 and Management) forums listed in the top section of the site. Click to be shown the (Supported) forums listed in the middle section of the site. Click to be shown the (UnSupported) forums listed in the bottom section of the site. Click to learn about, or pay for, forum Sponsorships. Click for the Official Forum Voting Poll.  VOTE! Click for info on owning a forum here at 24.

24HourForums.com > The Top 10 Supported Forums > 24's Political Matters > Obama will win by a small landslide

Share this topic...
Digg!  - Digg   Slashdot  - SlashDot    - del.icio.us    - Reddit    - StumbleUpon   - Facebook

 Moderated by: 24HourNut Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4   

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4803
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:16 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Erinna1112 wrote:  

Brian wrote:
Voting for a third party in a two-party system is a counterproductive exercise, unless you have a time machine to transport you to the next election.


But it's *not* a two-party system.  There are at least six parties with presidential candidates on my ballot. 

Sure, there are two major parties.  But I would rather be the only person voting for someone in whom I truly believed than to vote for "the lesser of two evils." 

Statements like the one quoted above is exactly *why* there is not more support for the lesser known parties.  People say "oh, gee, if I thought he had a shot I'd vote for him" and then look at me funny when I say "If you vote for him he might have a shot."

Great point, I meant to say that basic thing and forgot.  There are others in Government besides Repubs and Dems.




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.

Ads appear if not logged in.

Brian
Grand Poobah of Moderation


Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 4073
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:44 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
24HourNut wrote: Erinna1112 wrote:  

Brian wrote:
Voting for a third party in a two-party system is a counterproductive exercise, unless you have a time machine to transport you to the next election.


But it's *not* a two-party system.  There are at least six parties with presidential candidates on my ballot. 

Sure, there are two major parties.  But I would rather be the only person voting for someone in whom I truly believed than to vote for "the lesser of two evils." 

Statements like the one quoted above is exactly *why* there is not more support for the lesser known parties.  People say "oh, gee, if I thought he had a shot I'd vote for him" and then look at me funny when I say "If you vote for him he might have a shot."

Great point, I meant to say that basic thing and forgot.  There are others in Government besides Repubs and Dems.

There are absolutely other choices.  And they've had some success -- at the state level, where things aren't always so rigged against them.  The problem is that on a national level, they've never stood a chance.  I'd point you again to Nader.  All his presidential candidacies have done is help elect Republicans.  At the very least, we have a de facto two party system.  That's not going to change as the result of any presidential election.  It's only going to change if people vote in enough third party candidates to Congress to actually get the election laws changed.  The bar to running for president needs to be lowered to allow those candidates who aren't backed by the two parties in power to compete.  If they can't qualify for the debates under the current rules, then the rules need to be changed.

Until that happens, Erinna has the right attitude:  Vote for whoever you want, but don't hide behind, "Don't blame me.  I didn't vote for the guy who won."  By casting your vote for someone who couldn't win, you failed to support someone who could win.  Take Nader out of the 2000 election, and Gore would've been president, and the term "hanging chad" would never have entered the national lexicon.




"It's been a long December, and there's reason to believe maybe this year will be better than the last."

-- "A Long December", Counting Crows
wallstreetman
Original500© Member
 
Patriot
Joined: 
Location: Corona, Ca
Posts: 766
MyResume: 
MyJob: Businessman
MyForum: Political
MyLove: My kids
MyWish: A fair world
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:46 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Erinna1112 wrote: Fox, what evidence do you have that convinces you Obama is a Muslim?

What if he was? This is the kind of thinking thats in line with the Republicon Party, if you're not a Christian, you're a Anti- American Sub- Human!

News Flash, Not all Muslims are terrorists, and one of the reasons we left England was to have religous freedom!

Happy Thanksgiving!

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4803
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:48 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
If you deem both Major Parties as the same or worth the same, then voting against them is a very important thing to do. I think the more people that vote for third parties the better, because the more politicians see the lost votes, the more they will feel compelled to take up the issues and perform for those votes. So on that level alone I think it's a good idea. If it's true that both major Parties are going to keep harming, bankrupting, and ignoring our needs for real change and repair, then every single vote they don't get is a smart, important vote.

Both Major Parties have a scam going.  They have screwed us and can keep screwing us without fear of losing their status or jobs, really.  We are screwed from the inevitable corruption and bloat the Founders warned about.  Unless we start voting them OUT.  That is our tool.




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.
sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5189
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 2 kids - at least twice!
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:27 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Brian wrote:  I'd point you again to Nader.  All his presidential candidacies have done is help elect Republicans. 

By casting your vote for someone who couldn't win, you failed to support someone who could win.  Take Nader out of the 2000 election, and Gore would've been president, and the term "hanging chad" would never have entered the national lexicon.


This is SO true!!

As I posted in another thread,

if you do not honestly KNOW that your third party candidate has MORE experience and knowledge of foreign policy, MORE experience and knowledge of forming NATIONAL policy and legislation, GREATER experience with working with other nations and other Presidents/Prime Ministers, dealing with international crisis, major natural disasters than either of the leading two candidates
and if you really honestly believe that your third party candidate would not result in a deadlocked government because no one in the two Parties would work with them on ANYTHING whatsoever.

you are then doing a "protest vote" and if you vote Nader, you're handing the election to McCain, and I don't know about Barr or the others.

Either way, you're not picking the best of two who are less than we need

you're simply giving up ALL control or involvement whatsoever.


As I also said in that other thread--

The two Parties ARE NOT going to see your vote as a threat in ANY way..

They are simply going to ignore it, and even if 25% voted third, they'd still just wait until 2012, and then start "halfway" acting like some mix of the third parties, just to make it appear like they cared.

Brian is right though--- CONGRESS is where to vote third-- at the STATE level.

Vote third for various people in your STATE races.....

I wouldn't bother with voting third for a Presidential candiate *yet*

That's just handing free votes to one of the two Parties.

Last edited on 03:41 pm by sirlamre

sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5189
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 2 kids - at least twice!
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:45 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
24HourNut wrote: the more politicians see the lost votes, the more they will feel compelled to take up the issues and perform for those votes.

Absolutely untrue, except at the State level.

That, and we should DEMAND most of all that laws are passed that NO ONE who cannot VOTE, cannot control, donate, or ANYTHING else.

THAT will do much to remove corruption

Get those lobbyists, special interest groups, and CORPORATIONS completely OUT of the election process, and you'd see a LOT of the people who run decide NOT to since there wouldn't be $$millions$$ in the "campaign industry" any more

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4803
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 04:27 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
The only reason they are allowed to receive money from corporations is because we the People ALLOW the politicians/Government to get away with it.  Government inherently wants to control and get more, be corrupt (work for itself instead of the People), and bloat. The Founders warned about it. We the People allow corporate donations and influence with out votes toward the Parties that condone and engage in it. Period.




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.
sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5189
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 2 kids - at least twice!
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 04:48 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
24HourNut wrote: The only reason they are allowed to receive money from corporations is because we the People ALLOW the politicians/Government to get away with it.  Government inherently wants to control and get more, be corrupt (work for itself instead of the People), and bloat. The Founders warned about it. We the People allow corporate donations and influence with out votes toward the Parties that condone and engage in it. Period.

Very true--

But voting third Party isn't what will change that.

A national letter writing campaign with organized lists of what 300 milliong Americans WANT will be more effective.

When all members of Congress get the SAME letter signed by MILLIONS of people, asking that funding be revised in the SAME way, they won't have the option to come up with their own plan, full of corporate loopholes, etc.

It's just that no one can organize the entire country that way---

There are a LOT of things that if only people would speak with UNITY to the elected leaders, they would obey.

Trouble is, we Americans cannot all agree on HOW to get business OUT of politics

Mill and Aethel and others actually WANT their companies to have power over politicians to get what they want. They believe (aethel has stated more than once to me) that companies have just as much rights as a citizen does before the government.

I believe that companies should ONLY be able to ask their customers and employees to vote to get them what they want.
That way, they have to be GOOD to their cusotmers and employees to get anything they want!

Last edited on 04:49 pm by sirlamre

foxglovepress
Forum-Blogger©
Original500© Member

NON-PC!!
Joined: 
Location: USA
Posts: 7752
MyResume: 
MyJob: Love my FAMILY, COUNTRY and Dogs!!
MyForum: Politics- Religion- Open Tal
MyLove: Family and ?
MyWish: A government for WE THE PEOPLE!
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: On Hold for now.....
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 04:52 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
wallstreetman wrote: Erinna1112 wrote: Fox, what evidence do you have that convinces you Obama is a Muslim?

What if he was? This is the kind of thinking thats in line with the Republicon Party, if you're not a Christian, you're a Anti- American Sub- Human!

News Flash, Not all Muslims are terrorists, and one of the reasons we left England was to have religous freedom!

Happy Thanksgiving!

wallstreetman, I'm not even going to respond to this.  Check out the thread sirlamre started asking me about Obama and the Muslims.  You've got your thoughts, and I've got mine!  I'm not bending either!




Justice for Mark.....Imprison Employers Who Hire ILLEGALS!

Ads appear if not logged in.

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4803
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 05:11 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
sirlamre wrote: 24HourNut wrote: The only reason they are allowed to receive money from corporations is because we the People ALLOW the politicians/Government to get away with it.  Government inherently wants to control and get more, be corrupt (work for itself instead of the People), and bloat. The Founders warned about it. We the People allow corporate donations and influence with out votes toward the Parties that condone and engage in it. Period.

Very true--

But voting third Party isn't what will change that.

A national letter writing campaign with organized lists of what 300 milliong Americans WANT will be more effective.

I disagree - nothing speaks louder than our votes.  I'll take a unified vote to fire all the whores over letters any day.  You can write letters all day and that threat is dwarfed by the threat of votes.  Showing we will not tolerate the corruption with our votes speaks louder and is a more effective threat than anything, including mailing lists.

There is one exception to the above - the threat, ability, and willingness to kill them (a revolution).  I am not suggesting that, I am saying besides that, votes are the most powerful threat and tool.




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.

 Current time is 02:10 am
Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4   
24HourForums.com > The Top 10 Supported Forums > 24's Political Matters > Obama will win by a small landslide


Site Supporters
Posts Of The Day Mock Forums WowClassic



Themes and most mods done in collaboration with: WowClassic - powerful forum software with the best support service.
We are partners with Forum Owner Services
Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez