Enjoy the free Classified Ads! 24HourForums.com Home Thank you for supporting us. Click to enter Posts Of The Day.
Recent Posts Search by username
Search Contact Us Login Register
When logged in, click this to open up the Jumper for easier navigation. Click for details on our forum system in the Forum Center.
Click to be shown the (Top 10 and Management) forums listed in the top section of the site. Click to be shown the (Supported) forums listed in the middle section of the site. Click to be shown the (UnSupported) forums listed in the bottom section of the site. Click to learn about, or pay for, forum Sponsorships. Click for the Official Forum Voting Poll.  VOTE! Click for info on owning a forum here at 24.

24HourForums.com > The Top 10 Supported Forums > 24's Political Matters > Who Knew Congressman Foley was a Closeted Democrat?

Share this topic...
Digg!  - Digg   Slashdot  - SlashDot    - del.icio.us    - Reddit    - StumbleUpon   - Facebook

 Moderated by: 24HourNut

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
DesertRat
Forum-Blogger©
Pioneer100© Member


Joined: 
Location: Kiribati
Posts: 991
MyResume: 
MyJob: Insurance
MyForum: 
MyLove: My Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, My Wife & kids
MyWish: Can't we all just get along?
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 12:47 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
WHO KNEW CONGRESSMAN FOLEY WAS A CLOSETED DEMOCRAT?

At least liberals are finally exhibiting a moral compass about something. I am sure that they'd be equally outraged if Rep. Mark Foley were a Democrat.

The object lesson of Foley's inappropriate e-mails to male pages is that when a Republican congressman is caught in a sex scandal, he immediately resigns and crawls off into a hole in abject embarrassment. Democrats get snippy.

Foley didn't claim he was the victim of a "witch-hunt." He didn't whine that he was a put-upon "gay American." He didn't stay in Congress and haughtily rebuke his critics. He didn't run for re-election. He certainly didn't claim he was "saving the Constitution." (Although his recent discovery that he has a drinking problem has a certain Democratic ring to it.)

In 1983, Democratic congressman Gerry Studds was found to have sexually propositioned House pages and actually buggered a 17-year-old male page whom he took on a trip to Portugal. The 46-year-old Studds indignantly attacked those who criticized him for what he called a "mutually voluntary, private relationship between adults."

When the House censured Studds for his sex romp with a male page, Studds — not one to be shy about presenting his backside to a large group of men — defiantly turned his back on the House during the vote. He ran for re-election and was happily returned to office five more times by liberal Democratic voters in his Martha's Vineyard district. (They really liked his campaign slogan: "It's the outfit, stupid.")

Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy referred to Studds' affair with a teenage page as "a brief consenting homosexual relationship" and denounced Studds' detractors for engaging in a "witch-hunt" against gays: "New England witch trials belong to the past, or so it is thought. This summer on Cape Cod, the reputation of Rep. Gerry Studds was burned at the stake by a large number of his constituents determined to torch the congressman for his private life."

Meanwhile, Foley is hiding in a hole someplace.

No one demanded to know why the Democratic speaker of the House, Thomas "Tip" O'Neill, took one full decade to figure out that Studds was propositioning male pages.

But now, the same Democrats who are incensed that Bush's National Security Agency was listening in on al-Qaida phone calls are incensed that Republicans were not reading a gay congressman's instant messages.

Let's run this past the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: The suspect sent an inappropriately friendly e-mail to a teenager — oh also, we think he's gay. Can we spy on his instant messages? On a scale of 1 to 10, what are the odds that any court in the nation would have said: YOU BET! Put a tail on that guy — and a credit check, too!

When Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee found unprotected e-mails from the Democrats about their plan to oppose Miguel Estrada's judicial nomination because he was Hispanic, Democrats erupted in rage that their e-mails were being read. The Republican staffer responsible was forced to resign.

But Democrats are on their high horses because Republicans in the House did not immediately wiretap Foley's phones when they found out he was engaging in e-mail chitchat with a former page about what the kid wanted for his birthday.

The Democrats say the Republicans should have done all the things Democrats won't let us do to al-Qaida — solely because Foley was rumored to be gay. Maybe we could get Democrats to support the NSA wiretapping program if we tell them the terrorists are gay.

On Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes" Monday night, Democrat Bob Beckel said a gay man should be kept away from male pages the same way Willie Sutton should have been kept away from banks. "If Willie Sutton is around some place where a bank is robbed," Beckel said, "then you're probably going to say, 'Willie, stay away from the robbery.'"

Hmmmm, let's search the memory bank. In July 2000, the New York Times "ethicist" Randy Cohen advised a reader that pulling her son out of the Cub Scouts because they exclude gay scoutmasters was "the ethical thing to do." The "ethicist" explained: "Just as one is honor bound to quit an organization that excludes African-Americans, so you should withdraw from scouting as long as it rejects homosexuals."

We need to get a rulebook from the Democrats:

— Boy Scouts: As gay as you want to be.

— Priests: No gays!

— Democratic politicians: Proud gay Americans.

— Republican politicians: Presumed guilty.

— White House press corps: No gays, unless they hate Bush.

— Active-duty U.S. military: As gay as possible.

— Men who date Liza Minelli: Do I have to draw you a picture, Miss Thing?

This is the very definition of political opportunism. If Republicans had decided to spy on Foley for sending overly friendly e-mails to pages, Democrats would have been screaming about a Republican witch-hunt against gays. But if they don't, they're enabling a sexual predator.

Talk to us Monday. Either we'll be furious that Republicans violated the man's civil rights, or we'll be furious that they didn't.


By Ann Coulter
10-04-06


Ads appear if not logged in.

Djord
Original500© Member


Joined: 
Location: Hinkley, Ohio USA
Posts: 385
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 01:07 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
:iagree:

Gee I tried to find a lie in the article and could not.

construct
Pioneer100© Member

The Boy Next Door
Joined: 
Location: Fort Worth, Texas USA
Posts: 2677
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 05:05 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Well, I see you can cut and paste Ann Coulter. For a moment there I thought you'd gone off the deep end. Anyone who can't tell the difference between a 16-year-old and a 17-year-old may want to think about raising the age of consent.

Makarovii
Original500© Member

Privyet tovarishi!
Joined: 
Location: Long Beach, California USA
Posts: 281
MyResume: 
MyJob: To keep She Who Must Be Obeyed happy!
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: Yes!
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 06:19 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Djord wrote: :iagree:

Gee I tried to find a lie in the article and could not.

:ditto:  Lets watch the rest of the dems ignore the obvious too. ::eyemad::

DesertRat
Forum-Blogger©
Pioneer100© Member


Joined: 
Location: Kiribati
Posts: 991
MyResume: 
MyJob: Insurance
MyForum: 
MyLove: My Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, My Wife & kids
MyWish: Can't we all just get along?
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 06:26 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Makarovii wrote: Djord wrote: :iagree:

Gee I tried to find a lie in the article and could not.

:ditto:  Lets watch the rest of the dems ignore the obvious too. ::eyemad::

I've already heard answers to this from Dems. Basically they said something to the effect of "That was 23 years ago and is irrelevant"

Makarovii
Original500© Member

Privyet tovarishi!
Joined: 
Location: Long Beach, California USA
Posts: 281
MyResume: 
MyJob: To keep She Who Must Be Obeyed happy!
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: Yes!
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 07:26 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
DesertRat wrote: Makarovii wrote: Djord wrote: :iagree:

Gee I tried to find a lie in the article and could not.

:ditto:  Lets watch the rest of the dems ignore the obvious too. ::eyemad::

I've already heard answers to this from Dems. Basically they said something to the effect of "That was 23 years ago and is irrelevant"

In other words, "It's okay because s/he is a democrat!" :bs:

Makarovii
Original500© Member

Privyet tovarishi!
Joined: 
Location: Long Beach, California USA
Posts: 281
MyResume: 
MyJob: To keep She Who Must Be Obeyed happy!
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: Yes!
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 07:30 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
"Did ABC's Brian Ross Lie to Hype Foley Story?"

http://dreadpundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/did-abcs-brian-ross-lie-to-hype-foley.html

 

Blackhawk
Original500© Member


Joined: 
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 770
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: 
MyLove: 
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:29 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
I can't really think of any nationally known republicans that are not lying, corrupt people.  Apparently having no honor is a trait of the republican party and we're seeing that right here in the forum republicans who cannot accept responsibility for their chosen political party's support of pedophilia among it's ranks.  C'mon conservative guys, it's time to stand tall as men and quit arguing like juvenile slimeballs.  Suck it up and be men of honor.


Ads appear if not logged in.

DesertRat
Forum-Blogger©
Pioneer100© Member


Joined: 
Location: Kiribati
Posts: 991
MyResume: 
MyJob: Insurance
MyForum: 
MyLove: My Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, My Wife & kids
MyWish: Can't we all just get along?
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: 
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 07:17 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Blackhawk wrote: I can't really think of any nationally known democrats that are not lying, corrupt people.  Apparently having no honor is a trait of the democratic party and we're seeing that right here in the forum democrats who cannot accept responsibility for their chosen political party's support of pedophilia among it's ranks.  C'mon liberal guys, it's time to stand tall as men and quit arguing like juvenile slimeballs.  Suck it up and be men of honor.
:iagree::bestpost::ditto::exactly:


 Current time is 10:45 pm
24HourForums.com > The Top 10 Supported Forums > 24's Political Matters > Who Knew Congressman Foley was a Closeted Democrat?


Site Supporters
Posts Of The Day Mock Forums WowClassic



Themes and most mods done in collaboration with: WowClassic - powerful forum software with the best support service.
We are partners with Forum Owner Services
Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez