Enjoy the free Classified Ads! 24HourForums.com Home Thank you for supporting us. Click to enter Posts Of The Day.
Recent Posts Search by username
Search Contact Us Login Register
When logged in, click this to open up the Jumper for easier navigation. Click for details on our forum system in the Forum Center.
Click to be shown the (Top 10 and Management) forums listed in the top section of the site. Click to be shown the (Supported) forums listed in the middle section of the site. Click to be shown the (UnSupported) forums listed in the bottom section of the site. Click to learn about, or pay for, forum Sponsorships. Click for the Official Forum Voting Poll.  VOTE! Click for info on owning a forum here at 24.

24HourForums.com > The Top 10 Supported Forums > 24's Religion & Philosophy > Moses, and Biblical incoherence about who went up the mountain...

Share this topic...
Digg!  - Digg   Slashdot  - SlashDot    - del.icio.us    - Reddit    - StumbleUpon   - Facebook

 Moderated by: 24HourNut Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5251
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: heh. like I have the time
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 01:57 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      




I find this interesting...
Upon reading the verses, I find that I must agree with the author-- the Bible DOES contradict itself here...

So one of the sites that certain "religious" people here have quotes material out of is also  STATING contradictions in the Bible...

Interesting.... 

Here's the link to the below text:
http://www.awitness.org/contrabib/torah/calfcmd.html

Shows _many_ problems with Exodus...
http://www.awitness.org/contrabib/torah/exodus.html

<quote>

Anyone who carefully reads Exodus Chapter 24 should notice that it both states that these people all went up the mountain and then later another editorial revision suggests that they did not, for only Moses went up the mountain. The original source incident contains a reference to the Sabbath tradition in that Moses was on the mountain for six days and met God on the seventh day, with a later editorial revision to refer to forty days (an attempt, like the comment on David's harp playing, made to reconcile inconsistent accounts). Note that first it is said that no one must go up the mountain with Moses. (Italics should not be necessary, but are included.)

"And he said to Moses, "Come up to YAHWEH, you and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel, and worship afar off. Moses alone shall come near to YAHWEH; but the others shall not come near, and the people shall not come up with him." Moses came and told the people all the words of YAHWEH and all the ordinances; and all the people answered with one voice, and said, "All the words which YAHWEH has spoken we will do."" (Exodus Chapter 24 verse 1)

      However, a few verses later, bits and pieces from the earlier tradition surface (it is characteristic of the bizarre editing of the Bible that scraps were not thrown out, but rather an attempt was made to submerge and 'harmonize' the various conflicting accounts). Note that it is a constant refrain in the Golden Calf tradition that no one must ever see God (including Moses) or they would die. This theological doctrine has no part in the alternative tradition in chapter twenty four.

"Then Moses and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel went up, and they saw the God of Israel; and there was under his feet as it were a pavement of sapphire stone, like the very heaven for clearness. And God's arm was not stretched out against the chief men of the people of Israel; they saw God; they ate and drank." (Exodus Chapter 24 verse 9)

     In the famous Calf tradition even Moses was not allowed to see God, for,

"For no man shall see God and live." (Exodus Chapter 33 verse 20)

     The alternative tradition forbids anyone from going up the mountain with Moses and then everyone went up the mountain with Moses.

"...worship afar off. Moses alone shall come near to YAHWEH; but the others shall not come near, and the people shall not come up with him." "Then Moses and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel went up, and they saw the God of Israel; ... they saw God; they ate and drank."

The conflict between this statement and the opening sentences of the story is obvious and indicates that the introduction was a later editorial interpolation.

<endquote>

Last edited on 02:09 am by sirlamre




Armed with the power of Thy name nothing can ever hurt me, and with Thy love in my heart all the world's afflictions can in no wise alarm me.

Ads appear if not logged in.

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4932
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:08 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
This is shocking.  People created, edited, and/or manipulated archaic text to make it seem like was a consistent novel from God?  Sirlamre has lost his mind ...

 




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.
sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5251
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: heh. like I have the time
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 02:12 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
24HourNut wrote: This is shocking.  People created, edited, and/or manipulated archaic text to make it seem like was a consistent novel from God?  Sirlamre has lost his mind ...

 


Some would say I never had one.
However, in this case, I don't know that it's me that's lost my mind.

People who take the Bible literally are the ones who've lost their minds.

The Bible is true. Just not _literally_ true




Armed with the power of Thy name nothing can ever hurt me, and with Thy love in my heart all the world's afflictions can in no wise alarm me.
JustifiedByFaith
Pioneer100© Member

Without Jesus we fall short...
Joined: 
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 8391
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: Politics & Religion
MyLove: Not of this world...
MyWish: 
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:00 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
sirlamre wrote:



I find this interesting...
Upon reading the verses, I find that I must agree with the author-- the Bible DOES contradict itself here...



Then maybe the Baha'i faith needs to reference the Baha'i writings only and leave the bible alone? After all, if the Baha'i faith is credible and often belittles the bible... surely it doesn't need the bible so why use it or quote it to support your own religion?

 

 

Last edited on 03:01 am by JustifiedByFaith




Jesus said, "Take heed that no one deceives you."

Matthew 24:4


sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5251
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: heh. like I have the time
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:41 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
JustifiedByFaith wrote: sirlamre wrote:



I find this interesting...
Upon reading the verses, I find that I must agree with the author-- the Bible DOES contradict itself here...



Then maybe the Baha'i faith needs to reference the Baha'i writings only and leave the bible alone? After all, if the Baha'i faith is credible and often belittles the bible... surely it doesn't need the bible so why use it or quote it to support your own religion?

 

 

Sorry -- I meant to include

"the Bible DOES contradict itself here... if taken literally"

Now maybe you'll be able (for once) to understand that I'm NOT beating on the Bible---- but on the INTERPRETATIONS that some Christians put on it.

You usually miss that point entirely, and just gleefully assume that if I'm talking about some error in Christian THINKING, that somehow I'm maligning the Bible, as if YOU believe that every single Christian is some PERFECT representation of what Christ meant for us to be....







Armed with the power of Thy name nothing can ever hurt me, and with Thy love in my heart all the world's afflictions can in no wise alarm me.
JustifiedByFaith
Pioneer100© Member

Without Jesus we fall short...
Joined: 
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 8391
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: Politics & Religion
MyLove: Not of this world...
MyWish: 
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:44 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
sirlamre wrote: JustifiedByFaith wrote: sirlamre wrote:



I find this interesting...
Upon reading the verses, I find that I must agree with the author-- the Bible DOES contradict itself here...



Then maybe the Baha'i faith needs to reference the Baha'i writings only and leave the bible alone? After all, if the Baha'i faith is credible and often belittles the bible... surely it doesn't need the bible so why use it or quote it to support your own religion?

 

 

Sorry -- I meant to include

"the Bible DOES contradict itself here... if taken literally"

Now maybe you'll be able (for once) to understand that I'm NOT beating on the Bible---- but on the INTERPRETATIONS that some Christians put on it.

You usually miss that point entirely, and just gleefully assume that if I'm talking about some error in Christian THINKING, that somehow I'm maligning the Bible, as if YOU believe that every single Christian is some PERFECT representation of what Christ meant for us to be....




In your sly methods you beat on Christianity and Christians. I don't care so much that you do because I am kind of hard on the Baha'i faith but you always act like your not meaning to do it. :lmao: You clearly have an issue with Christians and display it in many of your threads and posts. Just admit it like I did.




Jesus said, "Take heed that no one deceives you."

Matthew 24:4


sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5251
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: heh. like I have the time
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:50 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
JustifiedByFaith wrote: In your sly methods you beat on Christianity and Christians. I don't care so much that you do because I am kind of hard on the Baha'i faith but you always act like your not meaning to do it. :lmao: You clearly have an issue with Christians and display it in many of your threads and posts. Just admit it like I did.


OK ----

Yes, I'm like Gandhi ----  I like (love) Christ... and aspire to be more like Him (ain't THAT a hopeless hope really-- who can ever attain)

But --- like Gandhi, I find that most Christians do not BELIEVE what Christ said as He said (a lot, but not all) of what He said.

And they CERTAINLY don't act like it.

And to be fair, the same can be said of a lot of Baha'is, Muslims, Jews, and everyone else...

But I find that Christians are the "most proud" of their "correctness" of belief and their "correct" interpretations of what their Book says.

Most other religions' members are FAR more humble than that...

Just rubs this ol' cats fur WAY backwards for Christians to have that "holier than thou" attitude...

so yeah, I'l admit that---

Here's my OFFICIAL statement:

1. Christ was exactly who and what He said He was. Not necesarily what SOME Christians THINK He said He was.... but I believe He is what HE said He was..

2. The Bible is clear spiritual and utterly accurate SPIRITUAL truth to that fact and others.
It is NOT meant to be taken literally (in most cases), nor is it particularly historically accurate in many cases-- even though it's the only record enough times that we really don''t know.  Men HAVE screwed around with the Bible, and God GOD GOD!!! has ALWAYS protected the spiritual truths in the Bible, and has not allowed translation errors, political agendas, egoistic thinking, etc - to get in the way of God's Bible from revealing its SPIRITUAL truths to the spiritually willing to set aside their pride and assumed knowledge.


Last edited on 04:08 am by sirlamre




Armed with the power of Thy name nothing can ever hurt me, and with Thy love in my heart all the world's afflictions can in no wise alarm me.
JustifiedByFaith
Pioneer100© Member

Without Jesus we fall short...
Joined: 
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 8391
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: Politics & Religion
MyLove: Not of this world...
MyWish: 
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 04:09 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
sirlamre wrote:
But I find that Christians are the "most proud" of their "correctness" of belief and their "correct" interpretations of what their Book says.

Most other religions' members are FAR more humble than that...



Ok. So you came clean. That's good. Thanks for laying it out on the line. I wonder what virtue would be found or integrity behind those who didn't stand rock solid for what they believed but were wishy washy and politically correct not speaking what they felt to be true in order to try not to cause waves?

Did Jesus play the fense?

 

 

Last edited on 04:11 am by JustifiedByFaith




Jesus said, "Take heed that no one deceives you."

Matthew 24:4


Aethelred
Pioneer100© Member

Ye Olde Dead King
Joined: 
Location: Six Feet Under
Posts: 2448
MyResume: 
MyJob: Professional Numismatist
MyForum: History Chamber
MyLove: God, family & liberty
MyWish: Truth
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male, married w/children
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 04:31 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
2. The Bible is clear spiritual and utterly accurate SPIRITUAL truth to that fact and others .
So far we agree.


It is NOT meant to be taken literally (in most cases),
Is this based on some authority other than your opinion?

nor is it particularly historically accurate in many cases-- even though it's the only record enough times that we really don''t know.
Can you give a few examples of historical errors in the Bible?

Men HAVE screwed around with the Bible, and God GOD GOD!!! has ALWAYS protected the spiritual truths in the Bible, and has not allowed translation errors, political agendas, egoistic thinking, etc - to get in the way of God's Bible from revealing its SPIRITUAL truths to the spiritually willing to set aside their pride and assumed knowledge.
Please explain what men have "screwed around" with the Bible.  When did they do this and what was their agenda?

JustifiedByFaith
Pioneer100© Member

Without Jesus we fall short...
Joined: 
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 8391
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: Politics & Religion
MyLove: Not of this world...
MyWish: 
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 04:49 am

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
24HourNut wrote: This is shocking.  People created, edited, and/or manipulated archaic text to make it seem like was a consistent novel from God?  Sirlamre has lost his mind ...

 

No, actually Frank... sirlamre hasn't lost his mind, he simply wanted to discredit the bible today but tomorrow will quote it for the furtherance of the Baha'i faith. It's confusing. ::wiseman::




Jesus said, "Take heed that no one deceives you."

Matthew 24:4


cynicalninja
Forum-Blogger©
Original500© Member

Smiling Shinobi
Joined: 
Location: In The Not So Grim North., United Kingdom
Posts: 4823
MyResume: 
MyJob: Resident Ninja
MyForum: cynicalninjas media molehill
MyLove: Sevenna
MyWish: To live forever - so far so good.
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: My business
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:00 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Sirlamre wasn't trying to discredit the bible JBF, he was questioning people who take it literally, like you.

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4932
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:02 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
JustifiedByFaith wrote: 24HourNut wrote: This is shocking.  People created, edited, and/or manipulated archaic text to make it seem like was a consistent novel from God?  Sirlamre has lost his mind ...

 

No, actually Frank... sirlamre hasn't lost his mind, he simply wanted to discredit the bible today but tomorrow will quote it for the furtherance of the Baha'i faith. It's confusing. ::wiseman::

JBF, I think you keep confusing "discredit the Bible" with "not interpret it literally."  I can see why you feel the way you do, and am not saying I think you are wrong, but I am not so sure sirlamre discredits the Bible if he is right about the literal interpretation of it.  He just may be more accurate about it. 




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.
JustifiedByFaith
Pioneer100© Member

Without Jesus we fall short...
Joined: 
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA
Posts: 8391
MyResume: 
MyJob: 
MyForum: Politics & Religion
MyLove: Not of this world...
MyWish: 
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: 
MySex: Male
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 03:24 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
24HourNut wrote: JustifiedByFaith wrote: 24HourNut wrote: This is shocking.  People created, edited, and/or manipulated archaic text to make it seem like was a consistent novel from God?  Sirlamre has lost his mind ...

 

No, actually Frank... sirlamre hasn't lost his mind, he simply wanted to discredit the bible today but tomorrow will quote it for the furtherance of the Baha'i faith. It's confusing. ::wiseman::

JBF, I think you keep confusing "discredit the Bible" with "not interpret it literally."  I can see why you feel the way you do, and am not saying I think you are wrong, but I am not so sure sirlamre discredits the Bible if he is right about the literal interpretation of it.  He just may be more accurate about it. 

I see your point, sirlamre is making a point here about literal vs symbolic interpretation... fair enough.




Jesus said, "Take heed that no one deceives you."

Matthew 24:4


sirlamre
Pioneer100© Member
 
Official Forum Troublemaker
Joined: 
Location:  
Posts: 5251
MyResume: 
MyJob: Cisco VOIP and network security engineer
MyForum: Political Forum, Religion Forum
MyLove: My wife and Joshua and Daniel!
MyWish: 
MyFile: 
MyIntro: 
MySex: heh. like I have the time
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 08:53 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
JustifiedByFaith wrote: 24HourNut wrote: JustifiedByFaith wrote: 24HourNut wrote: This is shocking.  People created, edited, and/or manipulated archaic text to make it seem like was a consistent novel from God?  Sirlamre has lost his mind ...

 

No, actually Frank... sirlamre hasn't lost his mind, he simply wanted to discredit the bible today but tomorrow will quote it for the furtherance of the Baha'i faith. It's confusing. ::wiseman::

JBF, I think you keep confusing "discredit the Bible" with "not interpret it literally."  I can see why you feel the way you do, and am not saying I think you are wrong, but I am not so sure sirlamre discredits the Bible if he is right about the literal interpretation of it.  He just may be more accurate about it. 

I see your point, sirlamre is making a point here about literal vs symbolic interpretation... fair enough.


Yes-- precisely....

The apparent "contradiction" that is the topic of this thread is really ONLY a contradiction if one interprets the Bible to be UTTERLY historically accurate  (and that it should be interpreted as directly literally as possible)

Certainly if one assumes PRECISE historical accuracy in the Bible, one gets into trouble with these verses.

But if one assumes that the Bible is making a SPIRITUAL point here, it isn't relevant any longer whether it was precisely historically literally what happened or not...

the spiritual truth is still there, unchanged; God has protected the spiritual truth--- any possible errors here are merely in historical details and are NOT relevant, if one is merely willing to look at the Bible in the SPIRITUAL context that is the true Reality of God.




Armed with the power of Thy name nothing can ever hurt me, and with Thy love in my heart all the world's afflictions can in no wise alarm me.

Ads appear if not logged in.

24HourNut
Administrator

Body pillows rock!
Joined: 
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4932
MyResume: 
MyJob: Forumite Torture
MyForum: Say Hello
MyLove: A quiet, empty house (never happens)
MyWish: To obtain very cool mutant powers
MyFile: [Download]
MyIntro: [Download]
MySex: Male heterosexual
Status:  Offline
MyPOTD: 
Return to topBottom of page
 Posted: 09:06 pm

Quote

Reply

PM

Alert
voters: 0      
Unless one wants to be ridiculously superstitious and pretend that exaggerations, myths, and embellishments don't get perpetuated, I can't see how a clear-thinking modern adult is supposed to believe every account in the Bible is literally true.




The best human beings start good new topics and vote on the better posts.

 Current time is 10:48 pm
Page:    1  2  Next Page Last Page  
24HourForums.com > The Top 10 Supported Forums > 24's Religion & Philosophy > Moses, and Biblical incoherence about who went up the mountain...


Site Supporters
Posts Of The Day Mock Forums WowClassic



Themes and most mods done in collaboration with: WowClassic - powerful forum software with the best support service.
We are partners with Forum Owner Services
Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez